Causalities of Tension and Incompetence.
Iran shot down a Ukrainian airliner over Tehran this week, after its retaliatory missile strikes on US facilities in Iraq. The plane was carrying Iranians mostly bound for Canada, which has a large Iranian immigrant population.
To make this plane, Iran's military shot down a civilian aircraft over their own capitol city.
This is because the Iranian military isn't great.
Iran has universal male conscription at 18 years of age. Interestingly, prior to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, it also conscripted women, but stopped at that time. This means it has a large conscript military.
And while it has obtained arms, as the greed and stupidity of nations exceeds their best interests all too often, their military is basically a 1970s vintage force.
We don't know what happened to lead to this tragedy, but my guess is that a tired and scared group of Iranian conscripts had been harangued by officers and seniors about expecting an American attack to the point they were worn out and scared. So they fired on what they thought was an American military aircraft and 176 completely innocent people, most of whom were their fellow countrymen. We don't know what happened to the men who fired the missile, but we can be assured that it is or was bad.
Nothing will happen to the men ultimately responsible for the tragedy, which is the Iranian Islamist leadership that has governed the country for forty one years and kept in on a violent path of regional Shiite dominance. That government will ultimately go down in an Iranian revolution of some sort, and much of their theocratic views forever with it.
Where this leaves the Iranian American Conflict is not known, but what has turned out to be the case is that an extremely risky course of action the US embarked on due to an order of President Trump and under the apparent urging of Mike Pompeo has been surprisingly effective so far. Nearly everyone agrees that Gen. Soleimani was a terrorist whose demise should not be lamented. That he was a uniformed officer of the Iranian paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, and the method by which it occurred really ramped up the risks, but Iran's response was ineffective, perhaps intentionally so, or perhaps simply because it was. And Iran managed to put the period on the entire event by following up an ineffective missile strike by shooting down a Ukrainian airliner. The U.S., in the meantime, has essentially declared the matter over.
Either as an example of truly masterful strategy, or by accident, the U.S. has effectively moved the bar on state sponsored terrorism and, due to the past week, managed to make state employed uniformed terrorist a routine target in wars on terrorism and to have exposed Iran's conventional forces as less than impressive. Iran may have in fact suffered a set back as a sponsor of terrorism and given its history, that's a large part of its diplomatic approach to the world. Without it, it's not much.
At least not much until it acquires a nuclear weapon, which it is now working on. Indeed, exposed as conventionally incompetent and now with a reduced military portfolio because of the changed nature of the game, it may be stepping back because it knows this has become a must for it.
Or so it probably believes. The irony of it is that nuclear weapons for small nations are, frankly, completely worthless.
To make this plane, Iran's military shot down a civilian aircraft over their own capitol city.
This is because the Iranian military isn't great.
Iran has universal male conscription at 18 years of age. Interestingly, prior to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, it also conscripted women, but stopped at that time. This means it has a large conscript military.
And while it has obtained arms, as the greed and stupidity of nations exceeds their best interests all too often, their military is basically a 1970s vintage force.
We don't know what happened to lead to this tragedy, but my guess is that a tired and scared group of Iranian conscripts had been harangued by officers and seniors about expecting an American attack to the point they were worn out and scared. So they fired on what they thought was an American military aircraft and 176 completely innocent people, most of whom were their fellow countrymen. We don't know what happened to the men who fired the missile, but we can be assured that it is or was bad.
Nothing will happen to the men ultimately responsible for the tragedy, which is the Iranian Islamist leadership that has governed the country for forty one years and kept in on a violent path of regional Shiite dominance. That government will ultimately go down in an Iranian revolution of some sort, and much of their theocratic views forever with it.
Where this leaves the Iranian American Conflict is not known, but what has turned out to be the case is that an extremely risky course of action the US embarked on due to an order of President Trump and under the apparent urging of Mike Pompeo has been surprisingly effective so far. Nearly everyone agrees that Gen. Soleimani was a terrorist whose demise should not be lamented. That he was a uniformed officer of the Iranian paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, and the method by which it occurred really ramped up the risks, but Iran's response was ineffective, perhaps intentionally so, or perhaps simply because it was. And Iran managed to put the period on the entire event by following up an ineffective missile strike by shooting down a Ukrainian airliner. The U.S., in the meantime, has essentially declared the matter over.
Either as an example of truly masterful strategy, or by accident, the U.S. has effectively moved the bar on state sponsored terrorism and, due to the past week, managed to make state employed uniformed terrorist a routine target in wars on terrorism and to have exposed Iran's conventional forces as less than impressive. Iran may have in fact suffered a set back as a sponsor of terrorism and given its history, that's a large part of its diplomatic approach to the world. Without it, it's not much.
At least not much until it acquires a nuclear weapon, which it is now working on. Indeed, exposed as conventionally incompetent and now with a reduced military portfolio because of the changed nature of the game, it may be stepping back because it knows this has become a must for it.
Or so it probably believes. The irony of it is that nuclear weapons for small nations are, frankly, completely worthless.
No comments:
Post a Comment